🌊🌊🌊 Hochwasser 🌊🤽🌊

Highly efficient client for Pixelflut: Faster than sturmflut!

Can currently only send a single picture though.

benchmark

The following benchmark was run on a max-spec X280 against version d4c574b.

I could not figure out what the performance bottleneck is, but it is not CPU limited.

To reproduce, run the following commands in separate shells:

iperf -s -p 1337
go run main.go -image benchmark/test.png -connection 10

55 Gbps on average! 🌊🌊🌊

sturmflut (./sturmflut 127.0.0.1:1337 benchmark/test.png -t 10, version 8ec6ee9) managed to get 48 Gpbs throughput on this system.

Hint: Benchmarking throughput against the [pixelnuke][pixelflut_gh] is pointless, as performance is then CPU-limited to ~1 Gbps by the server. Using iperf removes the server limitation.